Why your X sounds like ChatGPT?
You can tell in half a sentence.
No scene. No number. No side. Just a clean paragraph that would fit on any SaaS page in 2024.
That’s what the feed is full of now. Founders who “finally started posting” with an AI window open. The account gets more active. Reach doesn’t move. They blame the algorithm.
The algorithm is doing what it’s supposed to. People don’t stop on text that could have been written by nobody.
What slop actually is
It isn’t “AI wrote this.” Plenty of sharp posts started as a draft.
Slop is a post that survives if you swap the name, the product, and the industry.
“Building in public is hard but consistency compounds.”
“The best marketing is a great product.”
“Distribution is underrated.”
True. Useless. Anyone can say it. X does not owe that a distribution.
A post that works usually has one of these:
a thing that happened today
a number you didn’t have to invent
a position someone in your space will flinch at
a sentence only you would say out loud
If none of those are in it, don’t publish it. Rewrite or kill it.
Why the feed punishes it
X ranks what people do after they see the post. Replies first. Then the pause. Then a bookmark. A like is a weak signal.
Generic text gets a like from a friend and a scroll from everyone else. No pause. No argument. No “wait, that’s us.”
So the post dies in the first circle and the model learns your account writes skippable stuff. Next post starts behind.
That’s the loop, not “the algo hates AI.” The algo hates dead air.
Your voice is not a tone slider
“Punchy.” “Casual.” “Thought leader.” Those are costumes.
Voice on X is closer to this:
what you keep repeating when you’re tired
the opinion your team is bored of hearing
the moment from the call you weren’t going to tweet
That’s why scraping your last 200 posts and asking a model to “sound like me” still produces slop. The archive is what you already published. Half of that was already flattened. The model averages it.
What fixes it is new raw material. The call. The objection. The thing you almost posted and deleted.
Dump that somewhere. Then write. Not the other way around.
A quick test before you hit post
Read it once. Ask:
Could another founder in my category tweet this tomorrow?
Is there a specific in here — a name, a number, a room, a sentence someone said?
Would I defend this if someone replied “source?”
If 1 is yes and 2 is no, it’s slop. Delete the first line and start from the specific.
What to do instead of “write more”
Post less if you have to. Reply earlier. Put the product in the last line, not the first. Stop asking “thoughts?” at the end.
And stop treating the model as the author. Use it as a faster first draft after you already know the point.
If you want a cold read of whether your account already sounds like everyone else, run the audit. It won’t be kind. That’s the point.
See other articles
